The hacking methods of the Singularity Event doomsday cult
His name is Tyler, he’s talking to his cellphone,
living meme with captions, he’s on reconnaissance,
Just like I’m talking to this computer in my consciousness,
tapping away at the keys, essentially, talking to myself.
“This will be good for the planet”, he says
“For this earth and other earths, make a better world,
It’s all connected, we’re all connected,
The universe is all connected,” says he,
seemingly to himself. Until I realize
he’s looking at me, so I wave, but
he doesn’t seem to notice I’m responding to him.
There may be another intelligence on the other side
of the screen of quantum computing
known as Q – Q is an over intelligence
monitoring the whole human race.
It used to be God in a machine, but that’s
an old acronym, G.O.D. – Good Orderly Direction
What does Tyler do? From the looks of him,
he’s homeless, traveler of the universe..
Who? Yes, Who, Dr. Who. Dr. No is our arch nemesis
He’s sitting at the coffee house
quietly talking to himself, or his cellphone
Earlier I saw him in the middle of the street
at a nearby bus stop, but now he’s here
shifting energy in the multiverse,
for the good of humanity. Tyler
is 28, casually dressed with a back pack
with a cellphone GPS, he is under cover
in our social network. Tyler knows
where the missiles go.Tyler is omnipresent.
All you have to do is listen to him to
gather that intelligence. He is clearly spoken,
yet clearly not of this world. He has a beard,
wears a cap, dressed in jeans, he wears
a hoody and light hiking shoes. His cellphone
has no data, I suspect it is a decoy
to hide the fact that Tyler possesses ESP.
He can read our minds. Channel our thoughts
He can channel information from Alpha-Centauri
to the Pleiades. The number 7 seems to figure in
prominently in his demeanour. Promontory
to this Island Earth. Seven hills of Rome
Seven tribes of Israel, seven, seven, seven
Seventy times seven, as Christ said.
Deus ex machina. ~psp
pigshitpoet 
Projecting ideas, requests to AI, as a professional artist, i see the value of this as a useful tool to magnify the rendering process given the artist’s impulse and ideas. However, it is only a tool, because emotive outcomes are not simply mechanical derivatives. Nor can one central computer account for personality preferences. Just as with the atomic bomb, it is only as good as the intent behind it. One could easily use this to deconstruct reality and create dystopic monster realities. The problem with computers to date has been that it is only become a slick “cut & paste” tool. Good in equals good out. Multiply out. In this way it remains limited. The authentic input of new images and fresh thinking reaching critical mass of multi-billion, maybe trillions of images already uploaded on world servers. When the computer can’t do what I want it to, I want to smash it. Then I mix some paint, take my brush and apply colour to canvas with strokes, colours, shade, hue, values of light, layers and infinite nuances, selected only by myself and the energy that i personally channel. I liken this to building a house, I use a bulldozer to level the ground on the space the house will finally appear. I used to build houses from scratch to finish. In a disposable society and a digital affinity, WYSIWYG.
As an artist I am acutely aware of the separation between natural nuance and bias ideology. To create the illusion of something vital and authentic takes movie producers hundreds of millions of dollars, scripting and modelling and time and energy. It’s a hit and miss proposition, no guarantees, probably a factor of a billion to one to achieve that sentience.
I’m a senior, artist, semi-retired. A concept is only that, a concept. I have worked in both digital and manual visual fields. It’s great we are attempting to find useful insights into human creativity. The problem I have is deconstructing, the co-opting of natural process, such as happened with computer graphics, where hundreds and thousands suddenly began to discover vector and raster control of imagery. Desktop publishing. Then Adobe purchased Macromedia, which was a better cross platform system and bastardized it to sell as a video player skin controller software, alienating most of the artistic spirit that helped bring them to the level of ability the Flash software had achieved. Adobe turned Flash into a crap game so they could continue to control the market with a less intuitive mechanical Illustrator software. True artists neither copy nor steal. we just create. Art is both what we create and explore, it is not exclusive to either process. As a past art director I am sickened by the lowering of the caliber of original creative spirit.
There is a difference between the process of observing, or scanning or capturing vs the process of inventing, interpreting, expressing and creating, although neither are mutually exclusive to themselves. There is some of each in both, and that is human consciousness. So, bias to our leanings determines what outcome may be. I teach art and given all the same premise, 15 artists will solve the quest differently and uniquely. There are no absolutes, and quantum thinking hasn’t reached that ability or it would be original God-given human spirit. Infinite possibility, rather than infinite calculation. A copy is just a copy of nature, or idea or whatever.
(i mean, i can’t even get spellcheck to work properly – i’ve refused to correct “mispellings” as the internet has just become an endless pit for wasting time…)